Peer Review Policy

Journal uses double-blind peer review process, which means that both the reviewer(s) and author(s) identities are concealed from the reviewer(s), and vice versa, throughout the review process. This means that the reviewer(s) of the manuscript would not get to know the identity of the author(s), and the author(s) would not get to know the identity of the reviewer(s). Peer review helps validate research, establish a method by which it can be evaluated, and increase networking possibilities within research communities. Journal is following COPE Guidelines.

Review Policy:

  • Editorial Board may reject poor manuscript without any explanation.

  • Authors will be informed by Editorial Board if further review is required in manuscript. All publication decisions are made by the Journal’s Editorial Board on the basis of the reviewer’s report.

  • All submitted manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. All submitted manuscripts will be reviewed by double blind review process.

  • The manuscript will be send to the two reviewers simultaneously for blind review through mail and the remarks/modifications/amendments (if any) will be send to the author for further changes in manuscript.

  • The author will re-submit the modified/amended manuscript to the Journal Editorial Board within stipulated time.

  • The Editorial Board will verify whether the required remarks/ modifications/amendments are fulfilled by the author or not. If yes, the author will receive the acceptance by Editorial Board. If not, the manuscript will further sent to the author unless or until it is well modified.

  • If the manuscript is found to be plagiarized beyond the acceptable limits at the time of submission, the journal will contact the author.

  • In case if a manuscript is found to be plagiarized after publication, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct preliminary investigation, may be with the help of a suitable committee constituted for the purpose.